Department of Homeland Insecurity

October 7, 2014 - Picnic Time

  • A Keene, New Hampshire, city legislature member explained to a ACLU accurately since so many internal governments are requesting to a DHS program. “Our focus talked about a risk of domestic terrorism, though that’s only something we put in a extend focus to get a money,” he said. “What red-blooded American patrolman isn’t going to be vehement about removing a fondle like this? That’s what it comes down to.” 

    BOYS WITH TOYS
    As taxpayers, each American should be dissapoint with a billions of dollars that are being squandered on tanks safeguarding picnics in towns no militant has ever listened of. But Americans should also be dissapoint with how these billions of dollars are inspiring troops behavior, and melancholy everyone’s inherent rights as well. 

    According to Dr. Peter Kraska, highbrow of probity studies during Eastern Kentucky University, a series of SWAT teams in tiny towns has risen from 20 percent in a mid-1980s to 80 percent by a mid-2000s, while 90 percent of incomparable cities have had SWAT units given a mid-1990s. And nothing of these tactical teams are only sitting around watchful for a genuine emergency. The series of SWAT raids has exploded from 3,000 in a mid-1980s to 45,000 by a mid-2000s.

    A chilling news from a American Civil Liberties Union found that 79 percent of all SWAT raids conducted between 2011 and 2012 were to govern a hunt aver for probable narcotics. Only 7 percent of those raids concerned anything imitative a hostage, barricade, or active shooter situation, according to a report.

    Additionally, a volume of narcotics found in a homes that did enclose drugs didn’t clear a deployment of a heavily armed tactical section during all. Local law coercion agencies simply are not doing their due industry when they are creation their hazard assessments.

    The ACLU concluded, “more mostly than not, we found that SWAT annals contained no information to explain since a officers believed a sold unfolding was ‘high risk.’” Whereas probably each conditions where a SWAT group was deployed for a hostage, shooter, or barricading situation, there was minute justification substantiating since a group was justifiably deployed.
    Just some of a nightmares from a ACLU news include:

    • In 2008, Tarika Wilson was shot and killed holding her 14-month-old son in Lima, Ohio. The SWAT group was looking for Wilson’s beloved on a guess of drug dealing.

    • In 2011, Eurie Stamp was examination a ball diversion in Framingham, Massachusetts when a SWAT group destitute by his doorway and tossed a flash-bang grenade. He complied with officers, confronting down on a belligerent where he was shot, when one of a SWAT team’s firearms went off. They were looking for his son’s partner on drug charges, though arrested her outward of his house; they motionless to raid it anyway.

    • Also in 2011, Jose Guerena, an Iraq War veteran, investigated what looked favourite a male in a underbrush outward his home during a ask of his wife. He picked adult his purloin to see what was a matter. The SWAT group surrounding his residence dismissed 71 shots, attack Guerena 22 times. He died on his kitchen floor. The troops were looking for drugs; they found nothing in Guerena’s home.

    And troops are branching out from regulating their SWAT toys in drug raids. Libertarian publisher Radley Balko records that poker games have turn theme to SWAT group raids. SWAT units have been “sent into bars and fraternities suspected of permitting underage drinking, and even to make ethanol and occupational chartering regulations,” too, he wrote. Even sovereign agencies are removing in a game. “Earlier this year [2011], a Department of Education sent a SWAT group to a home of someone suspected of defrauding a sovereign tyro loan program.”

    DEMILITARIZING AMERICA

    There is a flourishing accord opposite America that a militarization of internal law coercion has left too far. “What we see going on in Missouri right now, for example–it’s one thing to supply troops with demonstration rigging in sequence to strengthen officers and so forth. It’s another thing to muster troops vehicles, uniforms that for all intents and functions demeanour like troops uniforms,” Terwilliger says. “Cops need to be protected, though we consider there’s during slightest a legitimate doubt as to either or not deploying troops officers in full troops gear–combat troops gear–invites a response that’s some-more dangerous to troops than another proceed competence entail.”

    But Terwilliger believes some jurisdictions do need a equipment.
    “Law coercion agencies, quite we consider a sheriffs in farming areas, are confronting cartels with involuntary weapons and explosives literally during a blockade on a other side of a border,” he explains. “Should they be versed to be prepared to understanding with a eventualities that that business presents? we consider a answer to that would be yes.”

    But that jurisdictions should build adult their troops capabilities and that ones shouldn’t? Terwilliger argues that internal governments should decide.

    “What we lift is an emanate for state and internal governments who account and control those troops agencies. And a emanate is how and when should … worldly tactical apparatus be used,” Terwilliger says. “And those decisions should be done during a state and internal level. Whether since it’s there it gets overused, we can see there could be a bent to do that, though that’s where law coercion managers and their metropolitan overseers need to step in.”

    The problem is that these appropriation decisions are not being done during a internal level. It is a sovereign supervision that is enlivening internal governments to spend large during sovereign taxpayers’ expense. Local law coercion is removing a giveaway ride. There is no bill imprisonment forcing internal law coercion to ask themselves if they unequivocally need all these cold new toys.

    Some politicians have had adequate of law coercion agencies branch America into a fight zone.

    “Washington has incentivized a militarization of internal troops precincts by regulating sovereign dollars to assistance metropolitan governments build what are radically tiny armies,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) wrote in Time repository after a new riots in Ferguson, Missouri began. “Police departments,” Rand wrote, are competing “to acquire troops rigging that goes distant over what many of Americans consider of as law enforcement.”

    UNDERMINING THE RULE OF LAW

    Growing up, my relatives told me to honour and trust a police; they’re a good guys. Their loyalty to open reserve is saved in renouned culture, with shows like “COPS,” “T.J. Hooker,” “CHiPS,” and “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit.”

    But in a post-9/11 world, interjection to a sovereign government, a cooperative cop, like a one Erik Estrada personified, is dead. We no longer see patrolman cars; we see tanks. We see troops utilizing military-grade weapons, some of that are unconditionally inapt for metropolitan policing. We hear about raids where full-blown tactical units are deployed in situations that don’t aver such a uncover of force.

    If we wish a subsequent era of Americans to honour and respect a order of law, we need to start right-sizing a internal law coercion agencies. And removing a sovereign supervision out of a internal reserve extend business would be a good place to start. •

  • source ⦿ http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2014/10/07/department-of-homeland-insecurity-n1901535

    More picnic ...

    › tags: Picnic Time /